skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Editor-in-Chief
Table of Contents
-
▼
2007
(33)
-
▼
October
(33)
- Front Cover
- Editorial - Page I
- Editorial - Pages II & III
- Editorial - Pages IV & V
- Pages 1 & 2 - The Real High Court
- Pages 3 & 4 - The Real High Court
- Pages 5 & 6 - Seasoned Veterans
- Pages 7 & 8 - Seasoned Veterans
- Pages 9 & 10 - An Excerpt From Behind Closed Doors
- Pages 11 & 12 - Get to Know ALSA
- Pages 13 & 14 - Get to Know ALSA
- Pages 15 & 16 - Introduction to the Careers Service
- Pages 17 & 18 - Introduction to the Careers Service
- Pages 19 & 20 - The Devil's Dictionary
- Pages 21 & 22 - The Devil's Dictionary
- Pages 23 & 24 - Innocence Lost
- Pages 25 & 26 - Innocence Lost
- Pages 27 & 28 - Innocence Lost
- Pages 29 & 30 - Innocence Lost
- Pages 31 & 32 - Innocence Lost
- Pages 33 & 34 - HRAFF
- Pages 35 & 36 - Dreamlarger
- Pages 37 & 38 - Dreamlarger
- Pages 39 & 40 - Seasonal Encounters
- Pages 41 & 42 - Seasonal Encounters
- Pages 43 & 44 - Event Review: MTP
- Pages 45 & 46 - Event Review: MTP
- Pages 47 & 48 - Event Review: Law Ball
- Pages 49 & 50 - Event Review: Law Revue
- Pages 51 & 52 - Event Review: Law Revue
- Pages 53 & 54 - Event Review: Soccer
- Pages 55 & 56 - Event Review: Soccer
- Back Cover
-
▼
October
(33)
Editor-in-Chief
3 comments:
How could you monkeys publish this as is?
This is clearly another story of shameless self-promotion by none other than Max Paterson. Not only does he attempt to get away with writing as little as possible on the revue so that he can move on to talking about himself, but most of the article is a discussion of the Monash Law Revue, which (although I understand Joel Tito was also a cast member of this show) is ridiculous.
A second problem with this article is that it's wrong. The Law Revue was and is a complete and total piece of shit. Anyone who actually finds it funny needs to stop playing with their Lego and go play in traffic.
Post a Comment